logo

/

Periodicals

/

Kronika: časopis za slovensko krajevno zgodovino

Jakob Aljaž: Between the Public Image of the Symbol of Slovenian Identity and Financial Hardship in Old Age


Author(s):Željko Oset
Co-author(s):Miha Preinfalk (odg. ur.), Barbara Šterbenc Svetina (teh. ur.), Manca Gašperšič (prev.), Rok Janežič (lekt.)
Leto:03. 02. 2026
Publisher(s):Zgodovinski inštitut Milka Kosa ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana
Language(s):slovenščina
Type(s) of material:text
Identifier:https://doi.org/10.56420/Kronika.74.1.09
Rights:
CC license

This work by Željko Oset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Files (1)
Name:kronika_2026-1.pdf
Size:8.94MB
Format:
Open
Download
Description

The article discusses Jakob Aljaž’s efforts between 1925 and 1926 to obtain a substantial increase in his congrua and an honorary pension proposed by the local authorities in Radovljica in 1926. It identifies the main factors underlying his acute financial insecurity: pasture dues were difficult to collect; the forests of the Dovje benefice, constrained by legal restrictions and a reforestation order, produced no income; and a long-standing dispute with Bishop Anton Bonaventura Jeglič over the allocation of timber-sale proceeds remained unresolved and unfavourable to Aljaž. More broadly, Aljaž’s financially ambitious public initiatives exceeded his means, leaving him with minimum savings and inadequate provision for old age. On the state side, limited recognition of his public service and prevailing administrative–political considerations created a paradox: even though his congrua was modestly increased in September 1925 and the Minister of Finance expressed support for further assistance, the Ministry of Religious Affairs ultimately rejected this gesture of goodwill, while the proposal for an honorary pension received no substantive discussion.

Metadata (13)
  • identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11686/72089
    • title
      • Jakob Aljaž – med javno podobo simbola slovenstva in finančno stisko v poznih letih
      • Jakob Aljaž: Between the Public Image of the Symbol of Slovenian Identity and Financial Hardship in Old Age
    • creator
      • Željko Oset
    • contributor
      • Miha Preinfalk (odg. ur.)
      • Barbara Šterbenc Svetina (teh. ur.)
      • Manca Gašperšič (prev.)
      • Rok Janežič (lekt.)
    • subject
      • Jakob Aljaž
      • pokojnina
      • draginjski dodatek
      • starost
      • kongrua
    • description
      • Članek obravnava prizadevanja Jakoba Aljaža za izboljšanje njegovega finančnega položaja po prvi svetovni vojni, ki vključujejo prošnje za povišanje državne podpore (kongrue) in predlog za podelitev izredne pokojnine za zasluge. Aljaž je kljub izjemnim zaslugam za utrjevanje slovenskega simbolnega prostora starost preživel v skrajni finančni negotovosti. Bil je povsem odvisen od skromne državne podpore, dotacij in darov, saj mu prihodkov od pašne bere ni uspelo realizirati, donos od rodovitnih kmetijskih zemljišč je bil majhen, z gozdom pa je imel stroške zaradi omejitev koriščenja in izdanega pogozdovalnega odloka. Obdobje po letu 1918 zaznamujejo draginja, Aljaževa investicijska velikopoteznost (gradnja stavbe Društvenega doma v Dovjah), izguba prihrankov župnije (odpis avstroogrskega vojnega posojila), finančno preudarna politika škofa Antona Bonaventure Jegliča (ustvarjanje prihrankov) ter povečan dotok turistov v Dovje (inflacijski pritisk na hrano in storitve).
      • The article discusses Jakob Aljaž’s efforts between 1925 and 1926 to obtain a substantial increase in his congrua and an honorary pension proposed by the local authorities in Radovljica in 1926. It identifies the main factors underlying his acute financial insecurity: pasture dues were difficult to collect; the forests of the Dovje benefice, constrained by legal restrictions and a reforestation order, produced no income; and a long-standing dispute with Bishop Anton Bonaventura Jeglič over the allocation of timber-sale proceeds remained unresolved and unfavourable to Aljaž. More broadly, Aljaž’s financially ambitious public initiatives exceeded his means, leaving him with minimum savings and inadequate provision for old age. On the state side, limited recognition of his public service and prevailing administrative–political considerations created a paradox: even though his congrua was modestly increased in September 1925 and the Minister of Finance expressed support for further assistance, the Ministry of Religious Affairs ultimately rejected this gesture of goodwill, while the proposal for an honorary pension received no substantive discussion.
    • publisher
      • Zgodovinski inštitut Milka Kosa ZRC SAZU
    • date
      • 03. 02. 2026
    • type
      • besedilo
    • identifier
      • identifier: https://doi.org/10.56420/Kronika.74.1.09
    • language
      • Slovenščina
    • isPartOf
    • rights
      • license: ccBySa