logo

/

Periodicals

/

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino

The Breadbasket of Slovenia

The Genealogy of a Metonym and Its Role in Nation-Building

Author(s):Jernej Kosi
Co-author(s):Jure Gašparič (gl. ur.), Mojca Šorn (ur.), Andreja Jezernik (lekt.), Cody J. Inglis (lekt.), Studio S.U.R (lekt., prev.)
Leto:2025
Publisher(s):Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino, Ljubljana
Language(s):slovenščina, angleščina
Type(s) of material:text
Identifier:https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.65.3.11
Rights:
CC license

This work by Jernej Kosi is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Files (1)
Name:PNZ_03_2025.pdf
Size:12.31MB
Format:
Open
Download
Description

This article traces the genealogy and nation-building role of the phrase “breadbasket of Slovenia” as a metonym for the Prekmurje region. Located in northeastern Slovenia, Prekmurje has often been portrayed by politicians, scientists, and journalists as the country’s breadbasket: a land of agricultural abundance that provides essential grain and foodstuffs. This designation—grounded in fertile soil, a favorable climate, and its significant production of wheat, corn, and potatoes—became prominent after the region’s incorporation into the Yugoslav state following the First World War.

Before 1919, the term žitnica (“breadbasket” and “granary” in English) appeared in Slovenian print culture in a broader figurative sense, but its specific association with Prekmurje emerged in the context of Austria-Hungary’s collapse and the territorial reorganization that followed. That metonymy fulfilled a dual purpose: it served as an economic descriptor and as a symbolic instrument of national integration. Slovenian officials and intellectuals, largely unfamiliar with Prekmurje’s realities, emphasized its agricultural wealth to justify its incorporation into the Slovenian territory of the newly created Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes.

Interwar journalism popularized the image of Prekmurje as “our breadbasket,” embedding it in the Slovenian national imagination despite the region’s persistent poverty, overpopulation, and food insecurity. This paradox—between the narrative of abundance and the lived experience of deprivation—illustrates how the breadbasket trope functioned as a tool of national integration. While obscuring structural fragilities, it fostered symbolic ownership and belonging , binding Prekmurje to the Slovenian nation. Persisting into the present, the metonym is still invoked across political and academic contexts, attesting to its ongoing significance.

Metadata (13)
  • identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11686/71610
    • title
      • The Breadbasket of Slovenia
      • The Genealogy of a Metonym and Its Role in Nation-Building
      • Žitnica Slovenije
      • Genealogija metonimije in njena vloga pri gradnji naroda
    • creator
      • Jernej Kosi
    • contributor
      • Jure Gašparič (gl. ur.)
      • Mojca Šorn (ur.)
      • Andreja Jezernik (lekt.)
      • Cody J. Inglis (lekt.)
      • Studio S.U.R (lekt., prev.)
    • subject
      • žitnice
      • Prekmurje
      • narodotvorni diskurzi
      • postimperialne tranzicije
      • obmejna območja
      • Prekmurje (Slovenia)
      • breadbasket
      • nation-building discourses
      • post-imperial transitions
      • borderlands
    • description
      • This article traces the genealogy and nation-building role of the phrase “breadbasket of Slovenia” as a metonym for the Prekmurje region. Located in northeastern Slovenia, Prekmurje has often been portrayed by politicians, scientists, and journalists as the country’s breadbasket: a land of agricultural abundance that provides essential grain and foodstuffs. This designation—grounded in fertile soil, a favorable climate, and its significant production of wheat, corn, and potatoes—became prominent after the region’s incorporation into the Yugoslav state following the First World War.Before 1919, the term žitnica (“breadbasket” and “granary” in English) appeared in Slovenian print culture in a broader figurative sense, but its specific association with Prekmurje emerged in the context of Austria-Hungary’s collapse and the territorial reorganization that followed. That metonymy fulfilled a dual purpose: it served as an economic descriptor and as a symbolic instrument of national integration. Slovenian officials and intellectuals, largely unfamiliar with Prekmurje’s realities, emphasized its agricultural wealth to justify its incorporation into the Slovenian territory of the newly created Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes.Interwar journalism popularized the image of Prekmurje as “our breadbasket,” embedding it in the Slovenian national imagination despite the region’s persistent poverty, overpopulation, and food insecurity. This paradox—between the narrative of abundance and the lived experience of deprivation—illustrates how the breadbasket trope functioned as a tool of national integration. While obscuring structural fragilities, it fostered symbolic ownership and belonging , binding Prekmurje to the Slovenian nation. Persisting into the present, the metonym is still invoked across political and academic contexts, attesting to its ongoing significance.
      • Ta članek obravnava genealogijo in vlogo, ki jo je imela in jo še zmeraj ima pri izgradnji naroda metonimija „žitnica Slovenije“. Prekmurje, ki leži na severovzhodu Slovenije, so politiki, znanstveniki in novinarji pogosto opisovali kot žitnico države – deželo agrarnega izobilja, ki daje najpomembnejša žita in živila. Ta naziv, utemeljen na rodovitni prsti, ugodnem podnebju in obsežni pridelavi pšenice, koruze in krompirja, se je uveljavil po vključitvi regije v jugoslovansko državo po prvi svetovni vojni.Pred letom 1919 se je izraz žitnica v slovenski tiskani kulturi pojavljal v splošnem prenesenem pomenu, specifična povezava s Prekmurjem pa se je pojavila šele v povezavi z razpadom Avstro-Ogrske in teritorialno reorganizacijo, ki je sledila. Vloga metonimije je bila dvojna: služila je kot gospodarski opis in kot simbolni instrument nacionalne integracije. Slovenski uradniki in intelektualci, ki v glavnem niso poznali realnosti Prekmurja, so poudarjali kmetijsko bogastvo pokrajine, zato da bi upravičili njeno vključitev kot del slovenskega ozemlja v okviru novo nastale Kraljevine Srbov, Hrvatov in Slovencev.Medvojna publicistika je popularizirala podobo Prekmurja kot „naše žitnice“ in jo vtisnila v slovensko nacionalno imaginacijo, in to kljub trdovratni revščini, prekomerni naseljenosti in pomanjkanju hrane v tej regiji. Ta paradoks – med pripovedjo o izobilju in izkušnjo pomanjkanja – ponazarja, kako je metonimija služila kot orodje nacionalne integracije. Hkrati z zamegljevanjem strukturnih šibkosti je spodbujala simbolno apropriacijo in pripadnost, povezujoč Prekmurje s slovensko nacijo. Metonimija je še zmeraj v rabi: zasledimo jo v političnih in akademskih kontekstih, kar odraža njeno aktualnost.
    • publisher
      • Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino
    • date
      • 2025
    • type
      • besedilo
    • identifier
      • identifier: https://doi.org/10.51663/pnz.65.3.11
    • language
      • Slovenščina
      • Angleščina
    • isPartOf
    • rights
      • license: ccBySa