logo

/

Periodicals

/

Retrospektive

Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia during the collapse of socialism and of Yugoslavia as the subject of historical analysis

Application of digital humanities methods

Co-author(s):Peter Mikša (odg. ur.), Kornelija Ajlec (gl. ur.), Maja Vehar (teh. ur.)
Leto:10. 10. 2018
Publisher(s):Združenje za promocijo kulturne dediščine, raziskav in novih tehnologij- Retrospektive, Ljubljana
Language(s):slovenščina
Type(s) of material:text
Identifier:COBISS-ID: 297275392
Rights:
CC license

This work by Jure Gašparič, Andrej Pančur, Mojca Šorn is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Files (1)
Name:Retrospektive_2018_I(1).pdf
Size:3.69MB
Format:
Open
Download
Description

This paper presents the methodological aspect of an in-depth analysis of the Slovene Assembly in the exciting period of 1990-1992, when democratically elected deputies changed and adapted the rules for all of society within the framework of socialist parliamentarism, and ultimately adopted independence acts. The research was carried out at the Institute of Contemporary History. The main area of interest was how the parliament per se operated at the time of transformation in 1990- 1992, and the conduct of the deputies/delegates. The analysis focused on verbatim transcripts of the Assembly's sessions. Of course, such an approach encounters many obstacles. The basic methodological problem is, of course, the great amount of sources (in 1991 alone the deputies uttered over 5 million words). We, the researchers, have therefore decided to take a different and methodologically innovative approach to the analysis. Our analysis will be conducted using digital methods and tools.

Metadata (13)
  • identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11686/44798
    • title
      • Skupščina Republike Slovenije v času razpadanja socializma in Jugoslavije kot predmet historične analize
      • Uporaba metod digitalne humanistike
      • Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia during the collapse of socialism and of Yugoslavia as the subject of historical analysis
      • Application of digital humanities methods
    • creator
      • Jure Gašparič
      • Andrej Pančur
      • Mojca Šorn
    • contributor
      • Peter Mikša (odg. ur.)
      • Kornelija Ajlec (gl. ur.)
      • Maja Vehar (teh. ur.)
    • subject
      • Slovenija
      • osamosvojitev
      • parlament
      • skupščina
      • socializem
      • razpad Jugoslavije
      • zgodovinopisje
      • digitalna humanistika
      • raziskave
      • 1990/1992
      • digital humanities
      • historiography
      • socialist parliament
      • dissolution of Yugoslavia
      • Slovenia's attainment of independence
      • transition
    • description
      • V razpravi je prikazana metodološka plat in depth analysis slovenske skupšcine v razburljivem obdobju 1990–1992, ko so demokraticno izvoljeni poslanci znotraj okvira socialisticnega parlamentarizma spreminjali in prekrajali pravila za vso družbo in naposled sprejeli tudi osamosvojitvene akte. Raziskave smo se lotili na Inštitutu za novejšo zgodovino. Pri tem nas je zlasti zanimalo, kako je parlament per se v casu preobrazbe 1990–1992 deloval ter kako so ravnali sami poslanci/delegati. V ospredje analize smo postavili dobesedne zapise skupšcinskih sej. Ovir pri tovrstnem pristopu seveda ne manjka. Osnovni metodološki problem je predvsem velika kolicina virov (samo v letu 1991 so poslanci spregovorili vec kot 5 milijonov besed). Raziskovalci smo se zato odlocili, da bo pristop k naši analizi drugacen in metodološko inovativen. Naša analiza bo namrec opravljena s pomocjo digitalnih metod in orodij.
      • This paper presents the methodological aspect of an in-depth analysis of the Slovene Assembly in the exciting period of 1990-1992, when democratically elected deputies changed and adapted the rules for all of society within the framework of socialist parliamentarism, and ultimately adopted independence acts. The research was carried out at the Institute of Contemporary History. The main area of interest was how the parliament per se operated at the time of transformation in 1990- 1992, and the conduct of the deputies/delegates. The analysis focused on verbatim transcripts of the Assembly's sessions. Of course, such an approach encounters many obstacles. The basic methodological problem is, of course, the great amount of sources (in 1991 alone the deputies uttered over 5 million words). We, the researchers, have therefore decided to take a different and methodologically innovative approach to the analysis. Our analysis will be conducted using digital methods and tools.
    • publisher
      • Združenje za promocijo kulturne dediščine, raziskav in novih tehnologij- Retrospektive
    • date
      • 10. 10. 2018
    • type
      • besedilo
    • identifier
      • identifier: COBISS-ID: 297275392
    • language
      • Slovenščina
    • isPartOf
    • rights
      • license: ccByNcSa