logo

/

Periodicals

/

Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino

The Attitude by Bishop Jeglič towards Dr. Korošec as a Politician and a Priest


Author(s):Janez Juhant
Co-author(s):Jasna Fischer (odg. ur.)
Leto:1991
Publisher(s):Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino, Ljubljana
Language(s):slovenščina
Type(s) of material:text
Rights:
CC license

This work by Janez Juhant is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International

Files (1)
Name:Prispevki_za_novejso_zgodovino_1991_1.pdf
Size:5.56MB
Format:application/pdf
Open
Download
Description

On the basis of the diary of bishop A.B. Jeglič and diverse literary sources the author describes the relationship between the supreme church authorities and a leading politician of a Catholic of a Catholic orientation. Bishop Jeglič had respected the political wisdom of Dr. Korošec and his position in the political hierarchy, the conflicting interests pursued by Belgrade and the Vatican, but intimately the bishop resented his chaotic clerical status. Briefly, the author also describes the relationship between Korošec and the successor of Jeglič bishop Rozman. The two bishops considered Korošec to be a most reliable mediator between the church on the one, and the court as well as state authorities, on the other hand, even though the relationship may often have been very tense, especially when the concordat had been signed.

Metadata (12)
  • identifierhttps://hdl.handle.net/11686/2280
    • title
      • Odnos škofa Jegliča do politika in duhovnika Korošca
      • The Attitude by Bishop Jeglič towards Dr. Korošec as a Politician and a Priest
    • creator
      • Janez Juhant
    • contributor
      • Jasna Fischer (odg. ur.)
    • subject
      • Anton Korošec
      • Anton Bonaventura Jeglič
    • description
      • On the basis of the diary of bishop A.B. Jeglič and diverse literary sources the author describes the relationship between the supreme church authorities and a leading politician of a Catholic of a Catholic orientation. Bishop Jeglič had respected the political wisdom of Dr. Korošec and his position in the political hierarchy, the conflicting interests pursued by Belgrade and the Vatican, but intimately the bishop resented his chaotic clerical status. Briefly, the author also describes the relationship between Korošec and the successor of Jeglič bishop Rozman. The two bishops considered Korošec to be a most reliable mediator between the church on the one, and the court as well as state authorities, on the other hand, even though the relationship may often have been very tense, especially when the concordat had been signed.
      • Avtor prikazuje na osnovi dnevnika škofa A. B. Jegliča in literature razmerje med vrhom cerkvene oblasti in vodilnim politikom katoliške usmeritve. Škof Jeglič je spoštoval Koroščevo politično znanje in upošteval njegov realen položaj v politični hierarhiji, nasprotje interesov med Beogradom in Vatikanom, intimno pa ga je motil njegov neurejen duhovniški status. Avtor na kratko označi tudi razmerje Korošca in Jegličevega naslednika Rozmana. Oba škofa sta ga sprejemala kot najzanesljivejšega posrednika do dvora in državnih oblasti, čeprav je bilo medsebojno razmerje večkrat zaostreno, posebno ob sklepanju konkordata.
    • publisher
      • Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino
    • date
      • 1991
    • type
      • besedilo
    • language
      • Slovenščina
    • isPartOf
    • rights
      • license: ccByNcNd
    Citirano v (1)
    TipologijaAvtor(ji)NaslovKrajZaložbaLeto
    1.01 Izvirni znanstveni članekMaver, Aleš ; Friš, DarkoIudica me, Deus : duhovniki v politiki na Slovenskem ter v srednji Evropi v prvi polovici 20. stoletja in Anton KorošecKoper ; MiljeZgodovinsko društvo za Južno Primorsko2018