/
Events
/
Conferences

The Jews were one of the first groups of the population subject to the systematic repression policy of the Nazi Germany, which finally culminated in the Holocaust. As the Nazi influence spread across Europe, the policy of repression against the Jewish population also spread. It was most evidently reflected in the Jewish refugees, also seeking refuge in the Slovenian territory. Finally in 1940 the Yugoslav state also adopted two anti-Jewish decrees. However, the decisive turning point in the attitude towards the Jewish population had not occurred until April 1941, when the Axis powers invaded Yugoslavia and divided it between them. At that moment the fate of the Jews in Slovenia depended primarily on which occupied territory they lived at. As early as in 1941 virtually all Jews fled towards Italy or were deported to Serbia and Croatia from the territories occupied by the Germans – the so-called Spodnja Štajerska and Gorenjska regions. At the territory occupied by the Italians – in the so-called Ljubljana Province – the Jews were mostly interned to Italy by the occupier, while the majority of those who were allowed to stay were later sent to concentration camps by the new German occupiers in 1944. The largest Slovenian Jewish community lived in the Prekmurje region, where they were dealt with by the Hungarian occupiers in complete accordance with their anti-Jewish policy. Thus in 1944 the Prekmurje Jews also ended up in the German concentration camps, where but a few of them returned from.In his contribution the author is not only going to present the most obvious forms of repression against the Jewish population like deportation, imprisonment and executions. He will also focus on the issues of confiscation of property, expropriation, and violation of human rights. He will also underline the differences and similarities between these processes at the various Slovenian occupied territories during World War II, place them into a wider context of the repression during World War II, and simultaneously compare them with the political repression and confiscation of property after World War II.