logo
ŽRTVE I.SVŽRTVE II.SVPOPISIZIC

/

Serijske publikacije

/

Arhivi

Javno tožilstvo Ptuj 1945–2000. Urejanje in popisovanje fonda ter interpretacija pisarniških okvirov poslovanja

Avtor(ji):Aleš Jambrek
Soavtor(ji):Gregor Jenuš (gl. in odg. ur.), Dunja Mušič (teh. ur.), Petra Markuš (prev.), Tanja Martelanc (foto.)
Leto:2017
Založnik(i):Arhivsko društvo Slovenije, Ljubljana
Vir(i):Arhivi, 2017, št. 2
Jezik(i):slovenščina
Vrst(e) gradiva:besedilo
Ključne besede:IZ ARHIVSKIH FONDOV IN ZBIRK, javno tožilstvo Ptuj, vpisniki, navodila in pravilniki, urejanje fonda, popisovanje fonda, sumarnik, FROM THE ARCHIVAL FILES AND COLLECTIONS, Public Prosecutor’s Office in Ptuj, register, instructions and regulations, arrangement of fonds, description of fonds, summary
Avtorske pravice:
CC license

To delo avtorja Aleš Jambrek je ponujeno pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 Mednarodna

Datoteke (1)
Ime:ARHIVI_2017-2.pdf
Velikost:8.87MB
Format:application/pdf
Stalna povezava:https://hdl.handle.net/11686/file25397
Odpri
Prenesi
Opis

S prispevkom skušam zainteresirani strokovni in laični javnosti približati arhivsko gradivo javnih tožilstev kot izredno zanimiv in uporaben vir različnih znanstvenih disciplin. V njem sem opozoril na zanimivosti in težave, s katerimi sem se soočal pri popisovanju in urejanju fonda Javno tožilstvo Ptuj 1945–2000, ter predstavil rešitve, s katerimi sem težave skušal odpraviti, tako da bi fond čim bolj pregledno popisal in ga približal bodočim raziskovalcem.

Metapodatki (12)
  • identifikatorhttps://hdl.handle.net/11686/41555
    • naslov
      • Javno tožilstvo Ptuj 1945–2000. Urejanje in popisovanje fonda ter interpretacija pisarniških okvirov poslovanja
      • Public Prosecutor’s Office in Ptuj 1945-2000. Arrangement and Description of the Fonds and Interpretation of Office Operation
    • ustvarjalec
      • Aleš Jambrek
    • soavtor
      • Gregor Jenuš (gl. in odg. ur.)
      • Dunja Mušič (teh. ur.)
      • Petra Markuš (prev.)
      • Tanja Martelanc (foto.)
    • predmet
      • IZ ARHIVSKIH FONDOV IN ZBIRK
      • javno tožilstvo Ptuj
      • vpisniki
      • navodila in pravilniki
      • urejanje fonda
      • popisovanje fonda
      • sumarnik
      • FROM THE ARCHIVAL FILES AND COLLECTIONS
      • Public Prosecutor’s Office in Ptuj
      • register
      • instructions and regulations
      • arrangement of fonds
      • description of fonds
      • summary
    • opis
      • The article draws attention to specifics and difficulties I encountered when describing and arranging the fonds Public Prosecutor’s Office in Ptuj 1945–2000. With the help of found instructions and rules for the functioning of the prosecution, I tried to bring the public closer to office operations of public or state prosecution in Ptuj and to the material of the aforementioned fonds. My intention was also to present, through instructions found in the material of Ptuj Public Prosecutor’s Office 1945-2000 and State Prosecutor’s Office 1944- 1999, the evolution of naming different registers in the years between 1945 and 2000 and the importance of their content for entering the cases at which I only partially succeeded. Several matters remain to be solved, especially those which were the reason I started writing this contribution, for example, content interpretation of registers O, U, E, KTS, and KTPZ for maintaining of which I was not able to find appropriate instructions. All findings are mere assumptions of inductive and deductive reasoning partially assisted by former employees at public prosecutions in Ptuj and my colleagues from other archives in the field of justice administration. Hopefully, my colleagues will find the answers to those questions in the future and will either confirm or refute my assumptions, thus helping to expand the table made during my research which is intended as a tool to help the archivists responsible for judiciary’s material in their work. The table shows which registers were kept by the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Ptuj through various periods of time and which matters were recorded in individual registers according to the rules or which matters are actually recorded there. The primary purpose of this contribution which aims to bring the fonds of the public prosecution closer to the general public and present it as an extremely interesting and useful source of material in various scientific disciplines was achieved. Its usefulness, however, will only be proven in the future when the material containing mainly sensitive personal data becomes completely publicly available.
    • založnik
      • Arhivsko društvo Slovenije
    • datum
      • 2017
      • 01. 01. 2017
    • tip
      • besedilo
    • jezik
      • Slovenščina
    • jeDelOd
    • pravice
      • licenca: ccByNcSa