logo
ŽRTVE I.SVŽRTVE II.SVPOPISIZIC

/

Serijske publikacije

/

Arhivi

Benediktinci in benediktinke na prostoru jugovzhodnih Alp

Avtor(ji):Anton Ravnikar
Soavtor(ji):Gregor Jenuš (gl. in odg. ur.), Dunja Mušič (teh. ur.), Petra Markuš (prev.), Tanja Martelanc (foto.)
Leto:2017
Založnik(i):Arhivsko društvo Slovenije, Ljubljana
Vir(i):Arhivi, 2017, št. 2
Jezik(i):slovenščina
Vrst(e) gradiva:besedilo
Ključne besede:ČLANKI IN RAZPRAVE, Benediktinci, samostan, Gornji Grad, plemstvo, ARTICLES AND PAPERS, Benedictines, monastery, Gornji Grad, aristocracy
Avtorske pravice:
CC license

To delo avtorja Anton Ravnikar je ponujeno pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Deljenje pod enakimi pogoji 4.0 Mednarodna

Datoteke (1)
Ime:ARHIVI_2017-2.pdf
Velikost:8.87MB
Format:application/pdf
Stalna povezava:https://hdl.handle.net/11686/file25397
Odpri
Prenesi
Opis

Avtor v svojem prispevku obravnava benediktinske samostanske hiše v srednjem veku na prostoru jugovzhodnih Alp. Avtorjev cilj ni podrobna analiza benediktinskih hiš, temveč želi prikazati njihove začetke in jih povezati z morebitnimi ustanoviteljskimi družinami ter najti medsebojne povezave, tu pa išče ključni trenutek, ki je determiniral korelacije med posameznimi monastičnimi ustanovami še stoletja.

Metapodatki (12)
  • identifikatorhttps://hdl.handle.net/11686/41531
    • naslov
      • Benediktinci in benediktinke na prostoru jugovzhodnih Alp
      • Benedictine Monks and Nuns in the South-East Alps
    • ustvarjalec
      • Anton Ravnikar
    • soavtor
      • Gregor Jenuš (gl. in odg. ur.)
      • Dunja Mušič (teh. ur.)
      • Petra Markuš (prev.)
      • Tanja Martelanc (foto.)
    • predmet
      • ČLANKI IN RAZPRAVE
      • Benediktinci
      • samostan
      • Gornji Grad
      • plemstvo
      • ARTICLES AND PAPERS
      • Benedictines
      • monastery
      • Gornji Grad
      • aristocracy
    • opis
      • In this contribution the author examines Benedictine monastic houses in the Middle Ages in the south-east Alps. The discussion focuses on the connections and correlations between individual houses. The main premise he follows is that the connections made upon the establishment of an individual monastery are the factor that had the key influence on destinies and primarily on the ties maintained between houses. What we have in mind is mainly the connection to the original monastery that was essential for every institution, and (this applies in particular to the monasteries established in the so-called investiture contoversy) the role that every monastery had or did not have in enforcing and introducing the spirit of reform movement from the 11th century onward. A general conclusion could be that a large part of Benedictine monasteries remained on the periphery of happenings of reform movement largely due to their close relationship with founding families and/or families that took over attorney’s tasks and influenced monastery policies. This is confirmed to the greatest extent by the example of the monastery in Gornji Grad which maintained close contact with aristocratic families until the very end of its functioning.
    • založnik
      • Arhivsko društvo Slovenije
    • datum
      • 2017
      • 01. 01. 2017
    • tip
      • besedilo
    • jezik
      • Slovenščina
    • jeDelOd
    • pravice
      • licenca: ccByNcSa