logo
ŽRTVE I.SVŽRTVE II.SVPOPISIZIC

/

Serijske publikacije

/

Kronika: časopis za slovensko krajevno zgodovino

Grad Rajhenburg kot zapor po 2. svetovni vojni

Ženski politični zapor (1948–1956) in moški kazensko poboljševalni dom (1956–1959)

Soavtor(ji):Miha Preinfalk (odg. ur.), Barbara Šterbenc Svetina (teh. ur.), Alenka Cizel (prev.), Manca Gašperšič (prev.), Andreja Jankovič Deržič (prev.), Dejan Zadravec (prev.), Lidija Slana (prev.), Meta Osredkar (prev.), Agencija MultiLingual (prev.), Irena Bruckmüller Vilfan (prev.)
Leto:2013
Založnik(i):Zveza zgodovinskih društev Slovenije, Ljubljana
Jezik(i):slovenščina
Vrst(e) gradiva:besedilo
Avtorske pravice:
CC license

To delo avtorja Andreja Jankovič Deržič je ponujeno pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 4.0 Mednarodna

Datoteke (1)
Ime:kronika-2013_3.pdf
Velikost:66.73MB
Format:application/pdf
Odpri
Prenesi
Opis
Članek obravnava doslej še neraziskano gradivo o povojnem ženskem političnem zaporu na gradu Rajhenburg od leta 1948 do 1956. Dotakne se tudi moškega kazensko poboljševalnega doma, ki je deloval samo nekaj let, in sicer od leta 1956 do leta 1959. Osredotoča se predvsem na življenje zapornic in zapornikov, ki so na gradu prestajali zaporno kazen. Uvodoma je predstavljena premestitev zapornic iz predhodnega zapora, kakor tudi sama adaptacija gradu, ki je bila nujna za potrebe zapora. Dotakne se tudi izobraževanja, kulturno-prosvetnih dejavnosti in dela, ki so ga opravljale zapornice v času prestajanja kazni. V drugem, krajšem delu prispevka je opisan kazensko poboljševalni dom za moške odprtega tipa. Poudarek je predvsem na opisu delovanja odprtega tipa zapora, ki se je v veliki meri razlikoval od klasičnega.
Metapodatki (12)
  • identifikatorhttps://hdl.handle.net/11686/35001
    • naslov
      • Grad Rajhenburg kot zapor po 2. svetovni vojni
      • Ženski politični zapor (1948–1956) in moški kazensko poboljševalni dom (1956–1959)
      • The Rajhenburg Castle as a Prison after the World WarII
      • Political Prison for Women (1948–1956) and the Male Offenders’ Correctional Facility (1956–1959)
    • ustvarjalec
      • Andreja Jankovič Deržič
    • soavtor
      • Miha Preinfalk (odg. ur.)
      • Barbara Šterbenc Svetina (teh. ur.)
      • Alenka Cizel (prev.)
      • Manca Gašperšič (prev.)
      • Andreja Jankovič Deržič (prev.)
      • Dejan Zadravec (prev.)
      • Lidija Slana (prev.)
      • Meta Osredkar (prev.)
      • Agencija MultiLingual (prev.)
      • Irena Bruckmüller Vilfan (prev.)
    • predmet
      • ženski politični zapor Rajhenburg (Brestanica)
      • moški kazensko poboljševalni dom
      • življenje zapornic
      • The Rajhenburg (Brestanica) political prison for women
      • male offenders’ correctional facility
      • life of women as prisoners
    • opis
      • Članek obravnava doslej še neraziskano gradivo o povojnem ženskem političnem zaporu na gradu Rajhenburg od leta 1948 do 1956. Dotakne se tudi moškega kazensko poboljševalnega doma, ki je deloval samo nekaj let, in sicer od leta 1956 do leta 1959. Osredotoča se predvsem na življenje zapornic in zapornikov, ki so na gradu prestajali zaporno kazen. Uvodoma je predstavljena premestitev zapornic iz predhodnega zapora, kakor tudi sama adaptacija gradu, ki je bila nujna za potrebe zapora. Dotakne se tudi izobraževanja, kulturno-prosvetnih dejavnosti in dela, ki so ga opravljale zapornice v času prestajanja kazni. V drugem, krajšem delu prispevka je opisan kazensko poboljševalni dom za moške odprtega tipa. Poudarek je predvsem na opisu delovanja odprtega tipa zapora, ki se je v veliki meri razlikoval od klasičnega.
      • This article deals with a material on the Rajhenburg after-war political prison for women from 1948 till 1956, which has not been explored until now. It also touches upon the male offender’s correctional facility, which was active only for a few years, from 1956 until 1959. The article mainly focuses on the lives of the prisoners, women and men, who served their punishment on the castle. Firstly, the transportation of the female prisoners from the preceding prisons is described, and then it continues with the necessary adaptations of the castle for the demands of the prison. It also talks about education, cultural activities and work that the prisoners had to undertake during their punishment. In the second, shorter part of this article, the male offenders’ correctional facility of an open type is described. The central focus is the description of an open-type of a prison, which was genuinely different from the classical one.
      • The article discusses the material about the after- war political prison for women on the Rajhenburg Castle, which has not been researched until now. It also deals with the male offender’s correctional facility, which succeeded the female prison in many respects. The central focus is on the lives of the female prisoners and on the conditions they had to endure during their penalty. The article begins by describing the process of the transportation of these prisoners from the previous prison in Begunje and it follows with the procedure, which had to be carried out at the admission of the prisoners. The adaptation of the castle, which was done before the alteration of its purposes and was necessary for the needs of the establishment, is also mentioned. It also deals with the structures of the offences, which the women were imprisoned for and emphasizes the importance of education dictated by the current political system. The importance of physical work, which was supported by the government, is also pointed out as the best means for altering the minds of the political prisoners. It continues with the description of the health system and the instructions under which the wardens had to act in case of a prisoner with a child or a pregnant woman. The part of the article about the political prison for women concludes with the reasons for termination, instructions at the completion of the penalty and the transportation of the convicts to another prison. In the second, shorter part of this article, the male offender’s correctional facility of an open type is described. The central focus is the description of an open-type of a prison, which was genuinely different from the classical one. It portrays the rights and duties of prisoners, as well as the privileges of an open-type prison. At the end, it does not define the reasons for closure of the prison because they were not depicted in the archives. The article is founded on the research of the material kept by the Archive of the Republic of Slovenia and on the professional scientific literature. It has to be noted that the indicated material is very limited, because several important data for the research have not been registered or preserved. This theme is not well treated in the foreign literature, which is why Slovene historians have made an important step in researching this period of history and have thus lightened the young researchers’ quest for the appropriate literature. The lack of the graphical material should also be mentioned, which is common to all totalitarian and authoritarian political regimes. The prohibition of documenting, its sanctions and the caution of the people is what led to the shortage of the graphic material.
    • založnik
      • Zveza zgodovinskih društev Slovenije
    • datum
      • 2013
    • tip
      • besedilo
    • jezik
      • Slovenščina
    • jeDelOd
    • pravice
      • licenca: ccByNcNd